tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8699431508730375743.post1769026926729045356..comments2016-07-20T07:15:28.987-07:00Comments on The History of Python: Dynamically Loaded ModulesGuido van Rossumhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12821714508588242516noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8699431508730375743.post-69885420236556827952010-04-01T11:09:41.568-07:002010-04-01T11:09:41.568-07:00we are making a translation to spanish for this bl...we are making a translation to spanish for this blog, that you can find in http://www.juanjoconti.com.ar/2010/04/01/la-historia-de-python-modulos-cargados-dinamicamente/<br />If you wish add a link, it's this: http://www.juanjoconti.com.ar/categoria/aprendiendo-python/historia/ <br /><br />Thanks for make Python.Joachttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02027757346242312656noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8699431508730375743.post-43919675953181584052009-03-18T11:51:00.000-07:002009-03-18T11:51:00.000-07:00Correction, ez_install (easy_install) is not equal...Correction, ez_install (easy_install) is not equal to eggs. Eggs is a deployment format. easy_install is a command-line installation tool that install packages in egg format. Although support for both the install tool and using the egg format is part of the same setuptools project.<BR/><BR/>Eggs do allow platform-specific binary data to be part of the distribution though, providing another way of getting around the problems of compilation by allowing a developer to build extension modules on their compiler-enabled computer and ship those pre-built binaries directly to the end-user.Wheathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01720512194160561870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8699431508730375743.post-27286842536382584332009-03-17T16:43:00.000-07:002009-03-17T16:43:00.000-07:00I try to be optimistic and consider easy_install (...I try to be optimistic and consider easy_install (and all the surrounding tools) to be prototypes that will show what Python needs to provide out of the box in some future version.<BR/><BR/>Personally, I think I use maybe about a third of the features that setuptools provide, and consider the rest to be mistakes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8699431508730375743.post-78193285779509168862009-03-17T15:28:00.000-07:002009-03-17T15:28:00.000-07:00Cython, the successor to Pyrex, looks like a reall...Cython, the successor to Pyrex, looks like a really interesting third-party tool for actually writing external modules or wrappers by compiling Python code down to C. For standard Python, the C code makes the appropriate calls into the Python runtime, but further optimizations can be done with type specifiers or decorators. Something like distutils is still needed to compile the C code.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com